Because of some major cock-up that occured, with regards to my editor and the press director etc, I had the fortunate liberty of covering two councils at the same time. The second council on my the agenda was the Security Council. This year, the Security Council had a pressing issue at hand. It was becoming obsolete, because much of it's efforts at maintaining International Security & Peace were futile. As was admitted by the Delegate of China, "It's not that the Security Council makes the wrong decisions, but that we[the Security Council] don't make any decisions at all."
Whether that could be blamed on the vast diversity of interests present within the council, or the pure selfishness of the delegates, was the main issue of discussion. Until they could find the root problem, they cannot move on.
The atmosphere of the Security Council was vastly different from that of the Historic Security Council. It was jovial and injected with, mayhaps too much, humour.
If some of you might have caught the news report awhile back, where a member of the room council (can't remember which) threw both his shoes at the then-President of the USA, George Bush. Though there was no shoe throwing this time, the Delegate of Canada still did give his shoe to the Delegate of USA all the same.
Halfway through, President Mugabe of Zimbabwe was pronounced as dead, having died in his sleep. Being the UN, they honoured him with a moment of silence. It lasted for approximately 2 seconds. That was pretty much how long it took for them to get over the shock of the sudden interruption before they went back to discussing if Egypt should represent the AU. It was the USA's idea.
Then came the writing of Resolutions. The delegate of Turkey drafted a resolution with faked signatories, so the look of shell-shock on the face of delegates who found their names on it was priceless.
All this, of course, explained why the article devoted to the Security Council by FOX News was titled "Clowns of Circus Towns". It was, of course, approved. We are FOX News afterall. :D
And with that, I will end this post with PICTURES.




That's me sitting in one of their sessions. I had to type out everything everyone had said, to better facilitate the writing of another article.

Delegate of USA, re-iterating his point that no one else listened to. Another apparent problem with the Security Council. No one listens to each other.


The Chair. Every Council has a Chairing Committe that ensures that order is carried out.

They do get passionate sometimes, especially during unmoderated caucuses.




Delegate of Japan (left) and Delegate of the United Kingdoms (right) both writing their own working papers.

These things are called chits. If delegates need to discuss something with another delegate (as open conversation is not permitted), they will write whatever they need to discuss on a piece of paper, or a 'chit' as they were referred to as, and a runner would be present to help them pass the chit.

Towards the end of the session, where the Council was approving the final resolution.
I am unclear as to what the final resolution was, besides the fact that they will be increasing the number of permanent member seats to 11, that it required at least 3 permanent members to veto a proposal before the veto would take effect, that USA would trade Nuclear Weapons with North Korea and that a system of 'Collective Veto' -- where non-permanent members could vote as well-- would be implemented. So that was some progress. We can only hope for peace.